Welcome to Campus Reform! Please Provide feedback or Report a Bug on this page.

The Politicization of Academia: Women's Studies.

dr_phil
By Phil Cleary, on Nov 09, 2010

Note: Phil Cleary is a senior at Gustavus Adolphus College.

Critics of CampusReform.org often charge that the "leftist abuses and biases" that it helps students fight back against are imaginary and exist only within the spheres of right-wing extremist imaginations. 

The problem with that criticism is that there is often blatent evidence pointing to the contrary.

Take for example the Gustavus Adolphus College (GAC) Gender, Women, and Sexuality (GWS) Studies Department.

You can access Gustavus academic catalog on the Gustavus website gustavus.edu.  Click on the academics tab in the upper left and scroll down to the page for the GWS department.  When you click on the resources section for the GWS department visitors are provided with a catalog of links.

Although the section titled "what can I do with this major" is yet to be filled out (ironic at all?) below it you'll find access to various feminist organizations.

These links include:

Feminist Majority Foundation

National Organization for Women

National Abortion and Reproduction Rights Action League (NARAL)

Minnesota NARAL

That their directory links to any of these organizations at all might raise the eyebrows of a few individuals, but what should be shocking to all people is the blatant political imbalance and ideological bias of the listed groups.

  • Concerned Women for America, the largest grassroots women's organization in America,  is not listed on their site.
  • Neither Feminists for Life nor the Susan B. Anthony List is listed, while NARAL is a prominently featured link.  Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life is nowhere to be found, even though the MN Chapter of NARAL gets prominent coverage as well.
  • While Feminist Majority is listed, a person might get the impression that student and campus groups like Network of Enlightened Women or other organizations that could be planted by the Leadership Institute's Campus Leadership Program don't even exist at all.

You'll see in the photos below too that a blog for the POL285 Sex, Power, and Politics Class includes even more links with an equally stunning political and ideological imbalance with links to organizations like the Guttmacher Institute.  

This all suggests of course that this department and its courses acts merely to transform students into activists for the causes that the professors believe in. 

The cliche criticism of academia is that too often it teaches students "what to think" instead of teaching young people "how to think."  Unfortunately, this department at Gustavus Adolphus College is merely an illustration of how that cliche is true.

Want to help break Gustavus' fortress of political orthodoxy?  Email or phone the GWS Department Chair and website manager to demand that the resources section of their course catalog be inclusive of diverse viewpoints instead of inclusive and narrow.

Peg O'Connor <poconnor@gustavus.edu> 507-933-7573.  (GWS Contact Person listed on website)

Elizabeth Baer <ebaer@gustavus.edu> 507-933-7324.  (GWS Chair listed on website)

Comments

After viewing your comment I would like to ask, have you taken one of these courses yourself? Although, your research is impressive do you have any personal experience with these courses. I would suggest before you state an opinion you should experience it firsthand. 

 

egreen3's picture

Tuition is much too expensive to spend time doing such a thing, and time is of value to me as well.  Otherwise perhaps I'd consider you're offer.

This principle you espouse, of having to experience something first hand before having an opinion on it, is not generally applied anywhere else though.  Most people wouldn't assert that a woman must experience date-rape before she decide that she don't want it to happen to her?.  In the same way, I don't think that I must do what you ask in order to be able to rationally form the opinion that I have based on the research I've done.   Might I ask why you think such thing is necessary?

dr_phil's picture

I am appalled that you made the parallel between a girl getting date raped and you taking a GWS course.

Also, I am not sure if you are aware, but you can sit in on any class that you would like for free. If "time is of value to you" perhaps you should sit in so that you are more informed on the subject of which you speak.

whitneyoconnell's picture

Also, those projects are student based. If you took that course you could make a project that aligns with your beliefs. 

whitneyoconnell's picture

If you think education is expenseive perhaps you should try ingnorance. "The greatest ignorance is reject something you know nothing about," -Anonymous.

egreen3's picture

egreen,

Note my choice of words -- education and tuition are two different things.

Going to college doesn't provide an education, it can only be an opportunity for an individual to become educated.

Though that being said, I do appreciate your anonymous quote about ignorance that ironically doesn't make sense gramatically.

whitney,

I'm not opposed to giving students the opportunity to pursue project that align with ones own beliefs.  What I am opposed to is providing a resource database that makes it seem as though there only exists a single set of beliefs -- for example, that all feminists ought be compliant with or permissive of the fetal holocaust.  While I am open to sitting in on a class when prudent or advisable,  the resources about which we speak are available from the department website.

dr_phil's picture